Rate The Banner/Signature

Team Rocket, yay!

Jesse was always hot.....

The only thing I can find wrong is that there's a little funk around the text. 9/10.

A little small, but it's nice. Very nice picture, and nice text. 9/10

Umino, cuite honey is always good, nice coloring, and it is clear, 10/10.

Which is better?

Current:



Transparent background:

that transparent one isn't transparent...

make it a transparent GIF file `-` ...that works.

quote:

Originally posted by evanASF27 that transparent one isn't transparent... make it a transparent GIF file `-` ...that works.

What are you talking about evan? It is so transparent. If I view it on here, the area that was white in the previous one is now gray, and if I view it on a blank white page, it is then white in the background. Also, if I make it a gif it won't look as good.

quote:

Originally posted by R.Smith quote: Originally posted by evanASF27 that transparent one isn't transparent... make it a transparent GIF file `-` ...that works. What are you talking about evan? It is so transparent. If I view it on here, the area that was white in the previous one is now gray, and if I view it on a blank white page, it is then white in the background. Also, if I make it a gif it won't look as good.

It looks transparent to me, too...some browsers cannot support transparency, which is probably why evan claims that it isn't...

In any case, while I like both signature pictures (though I liked your previous one so much more... ), the transparent one is a lot better, I think. I'd rate it 9.5/10 (whereas your current one would probably merit a 9/10).

The issue you're having is that PNG transparency does not display properly in IE.

R.Smith: I prefer the Transparent one, but it won't display properly in IE, of course.

Transparent: 9.3/10
White Background: 8/10

FP: It's growing on me. I can't really see any substantial flaws. I didn't like the gradiented text before, but it's fine for me now (maybe my glasses were dirty, maybe you've a new sig).

Rating: 9.6/10

I'm running on IE.

I see a very light grey background...but no transparent bits (and no I don't mean a grey that is the same shade as the forums)

Hmmm, so it won't look transparent to people using IE.......maybe it will make those on IE switch to mozilla?

Evan: Two awards, well, one award and one staff um...thingy. Both are good in my opinion. 9.5/10

FP*: Pretty good, but the text color kinda hits you in the eyes, and the background well, hm....it isn't "smooth". 9.5/10

Wienberg: Looks good, size is good, and there's really nothing negative to say about it. 10/10.


*Don't worry FP, I'll put that other one back up at the end of the year.

hey IE works for getting you around the internet. And a few people use transparent pngs ain't gonna make me switch. (most transparent things on the internet are GIFs anyway!) I'm satisfied with IE thank you

evan: 9/10 very good and they suit you.

• Attachment: GFPM.jpeg

Darkside,
Quality of attached image is good. That logo on the bottom right is pretty cool, yet simple at the same time. The clarity is OK, but could be better. The font is also a bit simple as well. Overall, it's pretty good. I give it a 8/10

evanASF27,
Quality of both images is good. I like the second image better because the clarity is a lot better than with the first one. The first image seems to have some grain in the dark spots, but nothing too big. I give it a 8/10

R.Smith,
Quality of image is very nice. I like the transparency of this image; looks a lot better than with a white background. Clarity is nice, and the color contrast is good. I give it a 9/10

I changed my sig into the one you see now, but you can still this one if you like also:


Later,
Trisa

Trisa, flawless, 10/10.

I've taken a liking to the Venture Brothers, so I made this sig. I might try a transparent version later.

R.Smith: Go Team Venture!

Rate: 10/10

Trisa- R. Smith's right, your signature is just about perfect 9/10

R. Smith- Great picture, nice animation, wonderful colors (love the muted red, bonus points for you for complimenting PCF's color scheme) 10/10

RogersGirl- Nice banner. It's laid out nicely, a little on the big side, there's too much blank black space, could be tightened up a bit. But the picture's great, crisp, good size, fantastic placement. . . intense guy ::stares:: 8/10

---------------
I figured 3 days with a crappy quality picture of Pokémon's main villians in bikinis was enough. Now I have. . . something completely un-original! lalala. . .

Dork, Team Rocket rules any day, but the background is a little noisy, and though I know it was part of the image, I'll have to give you a 9.9/10.

What do you all think about this version of my current sig image, its too much isn't it....?




I dunno why I played around with the image, ...I was ...bored?

R.Smith,
Quality of current image is good. I like the animation, and I do not notice any artifacts or grain. However, the animation on the second person on the right doesn't seem very smooth for some reason. The first person is fine, but the second seems to have jerky movement (of course, if you look hard enough, you can notice it). Nonetheless, it's a nice animated banner. I give it a 8.5/10

Quality of attached image is good as well. The animation is the same, but with different colors this time. I also notice that (in my computer, of course) the two guys seem to be going a little faster than with the first image. It's still pretty good overall, but the colors kind of distract the animation, so I give it a 8.5/10

Dork,
Quality of image is good. I do notice some a few grainy spots (although hard to see), but the color contrast is pretty good as far as that goes. The font is nice, and easy to read, but can be hard to find at first. Overall, it's pretty nice. I give it a 8.5/10

RogersGirl,
Quality of image is good. The placement of the person was pretty good. However, there is a lot of open space in the banner (perhaps I could have made it so there wasn't as much space as there is now). Overall, I like the font, and it's a nice, yet plain banner. I give it a 8/10

New banner. Edward from FMA.

Later,
Trisa

Trisa: (rating the FMA one) Very nice! Though I don't know why...but the light part of the face seems just a tad too bright (or maybe just a tad too much saturation)...one of the two...Overall very good. 8.6/10

Almasy: Overall a nice pan. The houses look a bit too emphasized (they stand out a little more than they should), as if they were pasted there. All in a a pretty good sigpic. 8/10

Evan: The first image is really low in quality, but the other one is pretty clear. 6/10