(continued from previous post)
| quote: |
Originally posted by vickiwinters
...
and, dude, come on. don't bash the west or America (at least not me specifically). just because our animation has been really sub-par for a good many years doesn't mean our culture is so bankrupt that it has prevented us from appreciating ambigiuous endings to TV shows. I can appreciate The Prisoner; I can appreciate Big O. |
I agree with you about the Prisoner - it was one of my favorite series, and an interesting series to compare Big O to. The central question of why #6 resigned is really never answered. But I think there are some big differences. In
Fallout the surreal meeting #6 has with #1 puts the series in some context, as well as the opening monologue at the beginning of every episode (very cool). You don't really get that with Big O, even if you include the 'memory scene' Roger has underwater - which could have been a good start. And as ambiguous as the Prisoner ending is, it is far more clear and concise than Big O's. But I interpret that as being due to
The Show Must Go On actually *not* being the final episode.
| quote: |
Originally posted by vickiwinters
Anyway, sorry, long post. |
Am I one to cast stones at others over long posts?
| quote: |
Originally posted by Big Neo
...
Too many questions were left unanswered. Such as, What is with Danstun's looping life, and why doesn't it happen with anyone else. |
Excellent point! The meeting of Dan and Little Dan (and Little Sybil Rowan) has got to be one of the single most bizarre scenes in Big O. It dearly deserves an explanation!
| quote: |
Originally posted by Big Waddle, in response to vickiwinters
There are many anime series that have the 26-episode standard. 13 episode per season, usually two seasons are all that are planned. In this case, there was pressure to create a second season. 26 episodes is more than enough, anything more can truly destroy a series. |
I completely disagree Big Waddle. Granted, there are many excellent series that end on episode 26. But I stress to you, there is nothing special or magical about the number 26. Serial Experiments Lain only has 13 (which I haven't seen yet, unfortunately) - and ends - right dawnstrider??

. My all time favorite from childhood, Star Blazers to some (Space Battlecruiser Yamato to OTHERS!) has something like 75+ episodes and a few movies to boot! I challenge you to seriously say it would have been better with only 26 episodes (which would basically amount to nothing more than the origional Iscandar/CosmoDNA storyarc). I have seen the '
good anime only has 26 episodes' line used a few times before in the forum, and it is definately a myth I would like to dispell. It you don't think I'm doing a good enough job, somebody say so, and I'll get more ammo (examples) and post some more.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Big Waddle
Roger Smith, the Negotiator is the main character of Big O. When his story concludes, there is no more to tell. This is why there can never be more Cowboy Bebop made, unless it's a movie that takes place before the conclusion. When the central protagonist's story is finished, there is no need to extend it to conclude the others'. As tough as it sounds, the other characters are ultimately irrelivant when compared to the plight of the central protagonist. |
That infers you think Roger Smith's story has concluded. Concluded how? And what exactly do you think his 'story' was? And how do you think it ended? I'm genuinely asking - I can't seem to think of anything that infers that, with the possible exception of the revelation of the negotiation job Gordon gave *A* Roger Smith at some point - but that was only reveiled in episode 25 - if you accept that, what do you think Roger's 'story' was for the previous 24 episodes?
| quote: |
Originally posted by Big Waddle
The question is, what then, is the meaning of the androids' existance? If Dorothy existed as a "real" Dorothy 40 years ago, why would she then be turned into an android for the reality we see in the series? If she is the real Dorothy, can she not then stay that way? Or was Timothy Wayneright's memory of a real Dorothy a prediction of the time to come? Perhaps characters' roles in Angel's play, her drama Metropolis, change as the Director sees fit, so that they may easily play the role best suited for them. Or perhaps Dorothy is real the way she is. Maybe the more real we become, the more like the androids we are. |
I like Zola's take on Dorothy. See her fanfics for details.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Big Waddle
Think about the androids. Dorothy. Instro. Fredrick. Do they not seem at times more aware than human beings? Or are the androids simply the product of people who are clinging to ideas that were cast away by the Director in her retooling of the drama (or as Shwarzwald says, the "comedy"). |
The only android who seemed that aware to me, was Big Ear, and even then, only at the beginning of
The Show Must Go On. It did seem like at that point he
did know the nature of Paradigm City et. al.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Big Waddle
Back to the subject at hand, there is much more answered by the conclusion given then you may give it credit for. Norman, Beck, Dorothy, and others have all fulfilled their purpose in guiding Roger to the Final Negotiation. |
I do agree - it seems to me that both Norman and Dorothy did some 'guiding' of Roger - but to what end? I was origionally thinking it was Roger becomming a 'Dominus' - and that was somehow crucial to saving Paradigm City (the simulation?) if not the 'real' world. But that doesn't seem to be the case now.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Big Waddle
As for the different endings, at first I thought "No Side" ended an episode in where no negotiation had really taken place, or that the negotiation had failed. "We Have Come to Terms" ended episodes in which negotiations were a success, or something important was achieved. "To Be Continued" would then end an episode that had a story stretching into another episode. This was used far too often in the second season for my theory to hold water. |
I think your theory is sound. Granted the 'To Be Continued' was used alot in season two, but I think it was pretty appropiate for the second half of season two - basically everything from
Stripes on is one big movie, IMHO.
| quote: |
Originally posted by clericblackdave
...
2) Its an age difference thing in my mind. The younger audiences are going to want another 26 episodes that "Americanize" the ending with an closed minded all strings cut and dry. I'm more interested in the symbolism and believe thats the entire point. |
I definately don't agree. I'm definately at the 'far' end of the Big O fan age spectrum - and I am definately not satisfied with the end, if it turns out to be episode 26. As for me generally liking things 'closed minded' and 'cut and dry', I'd like to point out
The Prisoner is one of the few sets of DVDs I own. So I feel I can take 'open minded' 'messy and wet' endings better than most.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Stampede
Ja, the biggest contributions Freud has made to anything in the past 20 years were being written in to Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure and having the "Id" turned in to a video game character for Xenogears. That's how seriously he's taken. And for good reason, too... |
Eric Wolfson (of Alan Parson Project fame) also did a very cool album called Freudiana that is based around Freud and his mythos. I think a stage play was done with the music too. Sorta another 'contribution' from Freud, I guess.
BTW A few misc. points. Thanks for the newsbllip
StevieV019. A big Welcome aboard (in case you haven't gotten one yet) to Negotiator Prime, vickiwinters, and AndroidDominus! And to you too,
clericblackdave - I may not agree with you much, but I respect your opinion, and am happy you're here
Hummm... anyone know if I have broken my own long, rambling post record yet?
[EDIT] It is a record for me - nearly 15000 characters!