The Tim Burton Thread.("Charlie")

Tickle Tickle 07-15-2005 09:57 PM
quote:
Originally posted by thebravest1
I still can't believe that they're remaking the original film.


It's a remake of the book, not the old musical.
Dork 07-16-2005 02:15 AM
A review, of sorts. ^_^

--------------------------------
Burton is right up my alley. I don't really go for horror flicks, so I've mostly only the the movies of his that fall under the twisted fairytale category.

I loved Edward Scissorhands and Nightmare Before Christmas. And after those two the Wonka movie certainly didn't disappoint.

The original Wonka movie is a true American classic. You can't go wrong with Oompa Loompas and Gene Wilder in a top hat. But it was exactly those elements of the original that had me a bit apprehensive going into the new movie.

Nothing and no one can top Gene Wilder, he's a classic in his own right, the most the Burton movie can hope for is a new interpretation of Willy Wonka. I like Deep's Wonka much better. I don't think he himself is better than the Wilder Wonka but I prefer him. I like his psychology. Wonka is a crazy or evil character, depending on how you look at it, to begin with. Wilder's Wonka was methodical and meticulous, consciously and constantly aware of his odditites. He was a sort of Angel of Death for self-ish children, he himself a tad evil but having been given the mandate from powers unseen to deal out justice.

Johnny Deep's Willy Wonka on the other hand is a notably disturbed man and detached, a bit apathetic towards the sufferings of others, and a bit flitty. For this he is much more frightening than Wilder's Wonka. There were times during the movie, when Wonka was all alone with his visitors that I was almost terrified for them. Of course, Deep's Wonka is a very childlike character, he opens his mouth wide when he speaks and enunciates his words in an almost exagerated way. He gives the tour like a five year old showing a visitor his room. The Willy Wonka character's logic is childlike to begin with -a waterfall to mix cholcolate, squirels to crack nuts- but Deep brings out the absurdity of this logic and the insanity it belies in a few choice moments. One scene near the end of the movie highlights Wonka's unstable mind in a deliciously chilling moment
spoiler (highlight to read):
after the last child falls victim to Willy's toy devices he looks around, dazed, and asks Charlie and his grandfather, with all sincerity and concern, 'Where have the other children gone?' Probably my favorite scene in the film


spoiler (highlight to read):
Charlie eventually endears himself to Wonka by recognizing where Wonka's logic is coming from. He doesn't share the same logic but in a moment of awed revelation he realizes where Wonka's coming from, and perhaps even recognizes that he's dealing with a mad man. In Burton's film that may be what saves Charlie; that he knows not to contridict Willy in his territory.


The Oompa Loompas, however; Burton did an alright job with, Burton's Oompa Loompas themselves can never even come close to their 1971 counterparts, the Oompa Loompas' songs though come frightfully close. They were a real delight to listen to. They're less fairy tale-like and more sophisticated with a more modern feel. Sounds in the movie throughout were wonderful, Danny Elfman did the soundtrack, afterall. My favorite sound though was when someone would break or bite into a piece of chocolate, it was a dull, thick, snap sound. Just lovely.

It's so late I'm just going to end now.

Oh, and I'm SO buying this movie when it comes out Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin


muchlove
-Dork
BethMcBeth 07-16-2005 11:55 AM
WAhooo excellent job on the description Dork!! Mwaha!! I saw the film last night too and I so loved it! I just love Tim Burtons twisted dark sacarism stuff! its to die for and Depp himself did a most excellent job as acting as willy Wonka and all in all ht emovie was excellent! the way it should have been defently much fun! The classic is great to but thsi puts it to a wholoe new level!

-Beth

P.S. I am buying it as well!!!!
Mrs. Beck 07-16-2005 12:48 PM
I saw the movie last night, as well - it's deffinatly in my top 3 favorites, possibly my favorite.
I never liked the original, but Burton's spin on the whole thing made it delightful to whatch. Not to mention Depp's own spin on Wonka.
My word of advice to those that haven't yet seen it: GO TO YOUR NEAREST THEATRE AND BUY TICKETS ASAP!!!!

Heh. I hate to say what's already been said, but I am /so/ buying it when it comes out!!!
Captain Maw 07-17-2005 11:50 AM
yeah, i really liked Wonka's humor in this one. Depp was a good choice. fake nose, fake teeth, i think.
much, much, much better than the first movie.
and the sub-plot they added was okay.starred Count Dooku
although i didn't like the remixed, retro'ed versions of the Oompa Loompa songs, but my sister was crazy about the welcome song.
Dork 07-17-2005 05:53 PM
Well, the guy who wrote this version never even saw the old Wonka movie. Both movies are based on a book by Roald Dahl. According to the booklet in the soundtract both Wonka's introduction song and the Oompa Loompa are adaptations of poems in the book. Besides the old songs are copyright whoever wrote the music for that movie. They wouldn't go with the attitude of Tim Burton's interpretation anyway.

There seems to be this attitude with remakes* that if the second can't possibly be any better than the first. The first is elevated to a near sacred position. And if the second is any good whatsoever that it takes away from the first. But it's flawed logic. These are two seperate interpretations of the same book, their respective writers, producers, actors and directors each had seperate visions of Willy Wonka's magical factory. Specfically nothing can take away from Gene Wilder's devilish Wonka.

And that being said:
spoiler (highlight to read):
Depp's Willy Wonka is not trying to off the kids, even though Wilder's probably was. I talked to this woman at Suncoast (I FINALLY FOUND ONE! It rocked!) who was a bit disappointed in the new Wonka movie because Depp's mannerisms weren't as ominous as Wilder's. I couldn't seem to convince her they weren't the same Wonka. You also can't expect a carbon copy recreation with remakes. It's not practical. That's absolutely no fun for the writers and directors involved.


I'm listening to the soundtract right now ^_^ Does Looking Depp as Willy Wonka dissolve anybody else into a fit of giggles? I thought he was a tad goofy when I first saw him, but now I love the character, so now he's totally cute (as in, 'aw, I wanna hug him' but I don't because he's nuts @_@ )


muchlove
-Dork


*I know this film isn't a remake but it follows the same principle

p.s. I like when Wonka walked into the elevator 'I gotta watch where I park this thing' Big Grin
Zopwx2 07-18-2005 01:23 PM
In what ways is Depp's wonka different from Gene. Becuase I loved Wilders sinister and demented Wonka.

I don't know I'm just on the fence right now, am I just going to be seeing the same movie with better FX or does it really have something new to offer.
Dork 07-18-2005 02:47 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Zopwx2
In what ways is Depp's wonka different from Gene. Becuase I loved Wilders sinister and demented Wonka.

I don't know I'm just on the fence right now, am I just going to be seeing the same movie with better FX or does it really have something new to offer.


I was never a fan of the 1971 film, I only saw the new one because Tim Burton and Johnny Depp were involved. Last night for the first time in years I saw the 1971 version. They are quite different films. Both versions follow roughly the same timeline. The Tim Burton film includes flash backs to Wonka's childhood and a history of the Oompa Loompas.

The key difference between the films, however, is their respective philosophies. This can best be seen in the two Willy Wonka characters. Any comparisons between Wilder's and Depp's Wonkas can only be made to point out the differences between the two characters; they are not playing the same Wonka.

Gene Wilder's Wonka is, as you said, demented and sinister. He is very much an adult, a man who is keenly aware of his oddities and consciously makes use of them in his banter with the kids and their parents. In a magical sort of way he's retained the simple, delightful logic of a child. When he explains that the chocolate waterfall is the best way to mix chocolate Gene Wilder makes you feel as though you have slipped into another world where this is entirely true.

Depp's Wonka is a disturbed individual. From the moment the children are asked to enter the gates by Wonka's disembodied voice they sense there is something terribly wrong about the world they are about to enter. While Wilder's character had retained the wonderful imagination of a child, Depp's character has the mind of child; Wilder's Wonka invites the children to hang their coats on hand-hooks that grab coats and hats, Depp's Wonka tells them to drop their coats inside the front door. A chocolate waterfall sounded fanciful when Wilder mentioned it but with Depp is just sounds crazy. Depp's Wonka is perhaps more frightening than Wilder's, Depp's character is a powerful man with wonderful (and dangerous toys) who is seriously out of touch with reality.

There are differences between the two sets of children as well. In the 1971 version the children were. . . well, children. They were delighted at Wonka's imagination, that there was an adult who thought as they did. They represented the greed, self-ishness, disobedience, and glutony that are present in every child to one degree or another.

The Tim Burton version features a child-like Wonka and in contrast very adult children. These are the kids of our age. They don't think in fairy tale terms, in a world that expects more and more responsibilty out of children these kids are already adults. Augustus is always looking for something better, he's quick to abandon what he has for the newest, grestest thing. Violet is always trying to get ahead, she thinks she's better than anyone else at everything she does and she wants to prove it. Veruca wants what she wants as soon as she wants it and she's willing to step on anybody, do anything to get it. Mike wants to prove to everyone that he's right. And then there's Charlie, the good one, the responsilble adult who's first thought is to sell his ticket to help his family. Together these kids are quick to point out the flaws in Wonka's logic. And they recognize Wonka early on for what he truely is; a complete nut.

It's a good film. One of Burton's best. Looked at objectably I don't know how you couldn't love it.


muchlove
-Dork
Patsai 07-18-2005 04:13 PM
I've seen both version, they're quite different, and the ending to it is quite different and in fact more heart-warming than Wilder's version.

My friend and I have been pretty obsessed with the movie since we've seen it that we've gone out trying to intimidate Depp's Wonka character. We really think he's that awesome.

Madrona 07-18-2005 10:49 PM
I saw it today. It's filled with the greys and dark tones of most of Tim Burton's movies. Even when it's bright and colorful, there is something wrong. Having seen the first one several times ( the first one, quite a bit recently) I can't say they compare. It's like two people telling you the same story. It's just not going to be the same.
I loved the Danny Elfman soundtrack. I thought the squirrels were great. The little "It's a Small World" bit was funny. And did anyone see the size of those scissors? Callback I say!
Dork 07-19-2005 12:40 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Madrona
And did anyone see the size of those scissors? Callback I say!


The placement of those sissors was no accident. I thought that was a cute little Edward refference ^_^

Oh, I love how the kids comment on the oompa loompa numbers.

"I say, that looked rather rehearsed"
"Like they knew it was going to happen"

Such a cool joke on musicals (even though I love them). The kids and their parents were so freaked out by the songs and Willy Wonka bobbed his head to them.

This Willy Wonka is so out of touch it feels so much more appropriate to call him 'Willy' than 'Mr. Wonka'.


muchlove
-Dork
Fujiko 07-19-2005 01:18 AM
I applaud Tim Burton. He did a wonderful job.

quote:
Originally posted by Madrona
And did anyone see the size of those scissors? Callback I say!


I noticed that too. It made me laugh a bit.

When the little dolls in the beginning began singing, I thought, "OMG, Disneyland!"

I liked the fact that they actually went into Wonka's past to show why he was so out of touch. And the Oompa Loompas were great.

spoiler (highlight to read):
A couple of my favorite things in the movie

Whipped cream Laughing

"Why do you need hair cream?"
"To hold in moisture." Smile
Captain Maw 07-20-2005 10:51 PM
yeah, i'd have to say: the Willy Wonka portrayed here is more accurate to the book, i mean, he was nice, but he had this dark side to him.
spoiler (highlight to read):
especially when he miraculously "found" the right key when Veruca fell down the chute
Dork 07-21-2005 12:35 AM
I bought the book at Target tonight. I'm four chapters in. It's surprising how much of the dialogue from the Burton movie was taken directly from the book. Mostly though, I bought it to give me something to do while waiting to go see it again hopefully tomorrow night.

My mom and I saw it the first time while my dad was out of town. Surprisingly neither of them had seen the Wilder version. So we finished that up tonight. Dad loved it, Mom -total Depp fangirl- ragged on it pretty hard. With any luck we'll see the Burton movie again tomorrow night. I haven't seen a movie twice in the theatres since. . . what was it? . . . probably, maybe, yes. . . Forest Gump. And we all remember how that one stayed in the theatres for a year.


muchlove
-Dork


"Oh, thank heavens, he's completely unharmed"
Redd 07-23-2005 12:40 AM
Is it just me or does Johnny Depp as Willy Wonka look/act a lot like Count D from Pet Shop of Horrors....? Confused Anyway, I saw it last weekend (i think..) and it was ok... I personally think the first movie was a lot better. I did like how they give Wonka's background and childhood... haha, I loved those braces. One of Charlie's grandmas was crazy. She was the best part of this movie. "I like grapes!" and "You smell like peanuts!" However, it did have a lot of flaws. I didn't like these oompa-loompas at all. It was only one guy, and they basically like, copied and pasted him over and over... I thought this wasn't a very good idea at all... Red Face The TV kid seemed a lot bitchier in this one too, and I didn't like the songs as much. Also, the first one exposed Charlie's flaws as a character, made him more realistic (like when he and his grandfather were in that bubble room place, and when he was considering the spy's offer of the Gobstoppers), but in this movie Willy Wonka basically said "wow, you're the last one left, you haven't screwed up so far, so you get my entire chocolate factory."

The best part about seeing this movie was the trailor for Corpse Bride. I can't wait for that one! Big Grin
Dork 07-23-2005 12:58 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Redd
Also, the first one exposed Charlie's flaws as a character, made him more realistic (like when he and his grandfather were in that bubble room place, and when he was considering the spy's offer of the Gobstoppers), but in this movie Willy Wonka basically said "wow, you're the last one left, you haven't screwed up so far, so you get my entire chocolate factory."


In the book this is pretty much the way things happen. Charlie's the last one left, so he gets the factory. It's a very simple children's story of a good, obedient child triumphing over other, 'rotten', children. It's more about personality types and mindsets. It's methaphorical as most children's stories are.

Normally I like my characters to be more flawed. But in the movie at least Charlie is only the protagionist while Willy Wonka is the main character. And Wonka has enough quirks and oddities to more than make up for that. In the end he is the character who is changed by the actions of the story.

I saw the movie again tonight. This is the first time in years I've seen a movie twice in the theatres. Very interesting experience. I enjoyed listening the rest of the audience. I don't think there was a kid in that room. Fun stuff. Now to forget about the movie entirely and watch old Johnny Depp movies until I can buy it ^_^


muchlove
-Dork
Generalissimo D 07-23-2005 07:58 AM
GAH! I STILL HAVENT SEEN IT! 12 HOURS IN THE STATES AND I STILL HAVENT SEEN IT! HERESY! BLASPHEME!

-_-

Comment on Oompa Loompas:
In the book they have Rosy pink skin and red hair methinks. Also, they were, basically, all the same. And I think there was a little explanation on how he(That is, my lovely future self Willy Wonka) aquired them.

On the book itself:
I picked it up in 5th grade one day. I liked it better then the Great Glass Elevator, mostly because it doesnt involve strange creatures trying to eat the world...

Note to self:Get those books...
Tony Waynewrong 07-24-2005 10:38 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Dork

The Oompa Loompas, however; Burton did an alright job with, Burton's Oompa Loompas themselves can never even come close to their 1971 counterparts, the Oompa Loompas' songs though come frightfully close. They were a real delight to listen to. They're less fairy tale-like and more sophisticated with a more modern feel.


I would have to disagree with you, R. Dork Wayneright! I believe the modern Oompa Loompa is somewhat better than their 1971 counterparts. The original Oompa Loompas were played by a bunch of midgets who were terribly limited in their ability to move. While trying to stay with the book, Tim Burton's OL's were more mobile and lively. They were the mischevous and prophetic beings that they were supposed to be. Their songs had more meaning and weren't as cute as the ones depicted on the 1971 version.

I am not saying the 1971 OL's were horrible or even inferior. I am just saying that these OL's, like the Depp Willy Wonka was purposely rendered differently. More detached and more focused. They didn't cause trouble; they just augment the announcement of it. Another words, they rocked in their own right.
Captain Maw 07-24-2005 11:36 PM
weren't they the same guy? anyway, i like the modern ones better. they're outfits change, and it was especially appropriate when they were "tribal".
Bllue 07-25-2005 07:56 PM
I like how he always makes everything creepy, like the begining of CatCF, With all of those machines and I'm just like "Woah!"

That was a fantastic show, except for the oompa loompa's. Eww ugly me, uglier women.