Rate the Avatar

Trisa: 10 outa 10: looken good as usual.

evanASF27: That deserves a ten as well. What can i say, a super genious is a super genious. Am i right?

GummiBear289: most agree with evan. It is one of the best.

Avenir: 9 outa 10, looken pretty good.

com_bun_bun: 5... sorry... but giant bunnies scare me.

Almasy: 7... its errr... diffrent.

RogersGirl: 8

Im not scrolling up anymore cause my eyes hurt.

Dingo:

There's one major issue that's causing problems with this avatar. That's the problem of clarity. There's almost a halo about the character's head. Additionally, no feature of the avatar is too clear.

However, I do really like the angle of view. It's a nice break from the tedium of front head shots. A profile is good now and then .

Rating: 7.9/10

Wienberg: That's...beautiful 10/10

Almasy:

Once again, Almasy, you've taken the route of unnatural skin tones. Everyone in there looks as if the life has been sucked out of them (although, they did have a tan before that happened). It's just an unnatural tan color.

Additionally, the background is very boring and it certainly doesn't help the "dead effect".

It is a bit over-shrunken, too.

Not to mention, I don't have a high personal opinion of the content (that goes for your signature, too).

The one good thing I can say about this is that I admire your photoshop skills (or, whatever program you use).

Rating: 7.1/10

quote:

Originally posted by Wienberg Once again, Almasy, you've taken the route of unnatural skin tones. Everyone in there looks as if the life has been sucked out of them (although, they did have a tan before that happened). It's just an unnatural tan color.

Um...what are you talking about?

quote:

Originally posted by Dingo evanASF27: That deserves a ten as well. What can i say, a super genious is a super genious. Am i right?

Being a genius certainly has its advantages
Dingo -- The avatar is very good...but for some reason the face seems to be a bit fuzzy and blurred O_o;; My eyes are probably playing tricks on me though. A solid 8.5/10 man

Wienberg -- the avatar would be better if you had the center picture (inside the frame) a bit large and focused a tad higher...yah I can't really describe it unless I edited the pic =_=;;; bah...but it's good 8/10

Com_bun_bun -- ....no comment ...10/10

Almasy -- I agree pretty much with Wienberg. More emphatically and specifically on the "Not to mention, I don't have a high personal opinion of the content (that goes for your signature, too)." ...I think that such content (even C.R.'s) shouldn't really be in a public forums. Don't care really if Krang permits it...it's just my personal morals that are screaming "uh-uh "...it's not personal mind you. 6/10

Clarity and quality wise, the avatar is pretty damn good. But still, the hints of fakeness (the unnaturally tan tone, the lighting) subtract from the overall effect not to mention that you know it's been edited to the nth degree. 7.8/10

yah yah sure sure

thanks though

quote:

Originally posted by evanASF27 yah yah sure sure thanks though

You're welcome...

...but I think I'm the next in line to be rated.

Almasy:

Once again, another avatar I'm not a fan of. Although I dislike the content for different reasons (specifically that I don't like Ms. Hilton), there are a bunch of technical reasons why I don't like it.

First of all, the color is far too bright. There's too much lighting, taking away from the coloration of the avatar.

Secondly, Ms. Hilton's face is blurry. She's not too sharp at all. Also, she seems to have a case of the measles breaking out again (as she did in one of your older signatures). Red dots pock her face.

Thirdly, the background provides no contrast. Your avatar is just one bright "blob", for lack of a better word at this time.

Additionally, and this is subjective, but Ms. Hilton's face...she looks like she's high on something. And, not a pleasant high. She looks dazed, and as if she's about to vomit. First of all, she's a bit pale (although, this could be attributed to the over lighting). Secondly of all, her eyelids are droopy, making it seem she's having trouble keeping them open. Finally, her mouth is open in such a way that I think she's drunkenly mumbling.

Rating: 5.2/10

Wienberg - 8 out of 10

It's a unique avatar and I really like it, but it's a tad too dark in some areas, making it difficult to see the person's hair. Aside from that, the border is well done and suits the image.

Avenir: Although I'm not the biggest Gundam know-it-all/fanatic in the world, I'm very fond of your avatar. I should watch seed and the ZEON sagas, as opposed to only G Gundam... 9/10

Cerpin Taxt:

This is really poor in quality.

1. Face=grainy
   
2. Background=white=bad
   
3. Shoulders are not smooth
   
4. Text is out of line
   

Rating: 4.3/10

Wienberg: The Kramer! 10/10 just for that!

Almasy: Too bright, her face and hair run together. That and I can't stand Paris Hilton. 3/10.

quote:

Originally posted by Cerpin Taxt Avenir: Although I'm not the biggest Gundam know-it-all/fanatic in the world, I'm very fond of your avatar. I should watch seed and the ZEON sagas, as opposed to only G Gundam... 9/10

Actually, it isn't Gundam. It's from the anime series Tekkaman Blade.


GAT-X105 - 10 out of 10

The clarity is very nice with no outstanding grains or blurs. The shot of the subject is nice and the border is very fitting.

quote:

Originally posted by Avenir quote: Originally posted by Cerpin Taxt Avenir: Although I'm not the biggest Gundam know-it-all/fanatic in the world, I'm very fond of your avatar. I should watch seed and the ZEON sagas, as opposed to only G Gundam... 9/10 Actually, it isn't Gundam. It's from the anime series Tekkaman Blade.

ME = PWNED!

Sorry, Avenir. I guess it shows you that I'm not as knowledgeable about certain anime titles.

I changed my avatar due to unpopular demand XP

Xana_fee: That avatar reminds me of Playboy Bunny.
Rate: 9.9/10

< Check it out my new avatar!
Rate this one.